• Welcome!
    |
    ||
    Logout|My Dashboard

Smoking marijuana, driving, and the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act - Tri-County Times: Newspaper: Ask The Judge Column

Subscribe | Connect with us:

Smoking marijuana, driving, and the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 9:32 am

 It is a fairly well known fact that it is against the law to consume alcohol to the point of being intoxicated or visibly impaired and then getting behind the wheel of an automobile and driving on a street or highway or other area open to the public.

 It is also against the law to operate a motor vehicle while under the influence of a controlled substance or a combination of a controlled substance and alcohol.

 But what of a situation where a driver has a medical marijuana registry card, smokes marijuana and then drives a motor vehicle without noticeable difficulty?  Is this against the law in light of the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act (MMMA), which allows using marijuana as a qualifying patient under certain circumstances?

 Recently the Michigan Court of Appeals was faced with this question when a defendant who had a valid marijuana registry card, was caught speeding and admitted smoking marijuana five to six hours before being stopped.  

 The MMMA provides that a person cannot drive if under the influence of marijuana.  However, another part of the drunk driving statute also provides that it is against the law to drive a motor vehicle with the presence of any amount of a Schedule 1 drug in your body.  Bad driving need not be proved.  Marijuana is a Schedule 1 drug.

 After carefully analyzing the drunk driving statute and the relevant portions of the MMMA, the Court of Appeals ruled that the MMMA does not sanction driving with marijuana in one’s system and held that the defendant could properly be tried under the applicable section of the statute.

 This is called a “per se” violation.

 What this means is that having a medical marijuana card is not a defense in such a situation and there is a risk of being prosecuted under Michigan’s statute if a person drives and there is a detectable amount of marijuana in the person’s system.

 The case is People v Koon.

  • Discuss

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • anonymous posted at 12:41 pm on Tue, May 8, 2012.

    anonymous Posts: 4398

    What a crock of NONSENSE. If a person has a VALID prescription for ANYTHING they should NOT be charged with ANYTHING unless unless someone is injured and it is that operators fault. In that case, it should just be the NORMAL charge, not some baloney tack-on charge.

     

Current Weather Conditions

Sponsored By:

Facebook Discussion

indeed Job search

what
job title, keywords
where
city, state, zip
jobs by job search